Legacy Attribution & Recognition

Africa's EdTech Breakthrough — Operational Reference

Executive Summary

This document is the operational reference for the Breakthrough Project's Legacy Attribution system. It defines the rules governing Founding and Scaling Attribution, lists the canonical attributable artifacts, and specifies the attribution format. For the rationale behind the system — why founding attribution is permanent, why institutional hosting is a distinct form of legacy, and how the system aligns with the Breakthrough Project's financial architecture — see Essay 24: Funding RESPECT™, Section 7.


1. Founding Capital vs. Scaling Capital

The Founding Circle (no more than two members) provides the catalytic capital for the Breakthrough Project's Tranche 1 — the high-risk seed funding that allows the Project to exist. To reflect this economic reality, the Project employs a dual-mode attribution system:

  1. Founding Attribution ("Founded by")

  2. Definition: The Founder of a Project is the Development Partner that funds that Project's Tranche 1 allocation. Founding Attribution is permanent and is not affected by subsequent funding from other sources.

  3. Nature: Permanent attribution.
  4. Application: Assigned to institutions, funds, or structures that require catalytic capital to exist.
  5. Function: Signals the existential role of the contributor in the creation of the asset.

  6. Scaling Attribution ("Scaled by")

  7. Nature: Time-bounded attribution (e.g., five-year terms).

  8. Application: Assigned to initiatives expanding the reach or capacity of existing systems.
  9. Function: Signals a material contribution to the growth and impact of the Infrastructure.

The "Scaled by" attribution is applied only during the scaling process (e.g., "Founded by [Founder]; Scaled by [Scaler]"). Thereafter, attribution reverts solely to the Founder.

Tranche 1 Lock-In: Funding a Planet-Project's Tranche 1 allocation is sufficient to secure permanent "Founded by" attribution and, where applicable, Institutional Hosting rights for that Planet-Project. If a different Development Partner funds the same Planet-Project's Tranche 2 and/or Tranche 3, that partner receives "Scaled by" attribution for the remaining duration of the Project — after which the attribution reverts to the Tranche 1 funder alone.


2. Institutional Hosting Rules

Four institutions within the Breakthrough System are proposed for domicile in the Gulf. Two constraints govern Institutional Hosting:


3. Stewardship of the Historical Record

The Project shall engage an independent historian to document the entire Project (budgeted within V&P_Core). The Historian serves as custodian of the attribution framework, ensuring that all recognition remains accurate, proportionate, and historically grounded for future generations. The historian holds no governance authority, funding discretion, or operational role within the Project.


Appendix A: Canonical Legacy Artifact Table — Sun-Project (V&P_Core)

Legacy Artifact Description Attribution Form Nameable?
Africa's EdTech Breakthrough Project The seven-year initiative designing and launching the system. Founded by… Yes
AUDA-NEPAD EdTech Task Force Secretariat The continental coordination body for policy domestication and trust preservation. Founded by… Yes
RESPECT Platform The Free and Open Source reference implementation of Africa's DPI-Ed. Institutional Hosting No — trademark primacy
Ecosystem Fund DP Bridge The $180M bridge financing mechanism for AppDevs and Localizers during ramp-up. Founded by… No — funder neutrality

Note on non-nameable Sun-Project artifacts: The RESPECT Platform's identity is governed by its trademark (RESPECT™), which is essential to the platform's economic sustainability model (see Essay 8). The Ecosystem Fund DP Bridge is a multi-contributor financing mechanism whose credibility depends on independence from any single Development Partner's brand.


Appendix B: Canonical Legacy Artifact Table — Planet-Projects

Nine of the ten Planet-Projects are independently fundable, independently nameable legacy assets. The tenth — the EdTech Task Force coordination programme — funds time-bounded coordination overhead, not institution-building; it carries no Legacy Attribution (see Essay 26, Section 4.10).

Legacy Artifact Description† Attribution Form Nameable?
PREMIER Institute Platform Research and Engineering for Modern Infrastructure in Education Readiness. $28.9M over 7 years (Institute + Little Easies). Institute Founder has Right of First Refusal on both Big Easies (ECM, Easy FLN Localization). Founded by… + Institutional Hosting Yes
ECM Research Program Easy Curriculum Mapping: building the Curriculum Intermediate Representation for Africa's DPI-Ed. $10.7M over 48 months. PREMIER-housed, independently funded. Founded by… Yes
Easy FLN Localization Easy FLN Localization: building the Writing Intermediate Representation for FLN courseware localization. $8.6M over 48 months. PREMIER-housed, independently funded. Founded by… Yes
CRADLE Research Program Continental Research Architecture for Data Linkage in Education. $10.7M over 2 years. Founded by… Yes
RBF4Ed Evidence Infrastructure Results-Based Finance for Education: building finance-grade evidence infrastructure. $23.5M over 7 years. Founded by… Yes
IMPACT Board Infrastructure Mastery for Professional Accreditation, Certification, and Technology. $15.0M over 7 years. Founded by… + Institutional Hosting Yes
PROMISE Program Professional Resources on Mobile for Instructional Skills in Education. $9.6M over 3 years. Founded by… Yes
SLATE Program Secure Learning Appliances for Teaching and Education (LearnTab™). $10.7M over 3 years. Founded by… Yes
BEINGS Program Building Educational Infrastructure Norms with GovStack. $7.5M over 3 years. Founded by… Yes

†Planet-Project budgets are stated gross of the 7% coordination levy; base amounts (pre-levy) are specified in each Planet-Project's proposal.

Note on the IMPACT Board and PREMIER Institute: Both are nameable ("The IMPACT Board, Founded by [Development Partner]"; "The PREMIER Institute, Founded by [Development Partner]") and proposed for domicile in the Gulf. Each funder receives a dual legacy: permanent naming attribution and Institutional Hosting prestige (see Section 2 hosting rules). Each counts as one of the funder's two permitted hosting claims under the Hosting Cap.


Appendix C: Canonical Legacy Artifact Table — Gulf-Hosted Institutions

Two institutions — the GEOS Organization and the SOCLE Board — derive their authority from demonstrated independence and cannot carry a funder's name; for these, hosting is the primary form of legacy. Two — the IMPACT Board and the PREMIER Institute — can carry a funder's name (see Appendix B) and are also eligible for hosting, giving their Founders a dual legacy.

Legacy Artifact Description Requires Funding Of Attribution Form Nameable?
GEOS Organization Global Education Outcomes Standards Organization: the independent standards body for finance-grade educational outcome signals. Gulf-based. RBF4Ed Institutional Hosting No — independence essential
SOCLE Board SOCLE Board (Standard for Open Curriculum Logic in Education): independent governance of the Curriculum IR specification. Gulf-based. ECM Institutional Hosting No — neutrality essential
IMPACT Board Professional certification body for Mappers, Impletors, and DPI Engineers. Gulf-based. IMPACT Board Founded by… + Institutional Hosting Yes (see Appendix B)
PREMIER Institute Platform research institute ("Easy X" capabilities). Gulf-based. PREMIER Institute Founded by… + Institutional Hosting Yes (see Appendix B)

Hosting Cap: No single Founding Circle member may claim more than two of the four hostable institutions. The remaining institutions are hosted by a different Founding Circle member or Gulf state.

Planet-Project Dependency: Hosting rights require funding the related Planet-Project's Tranche 1 allocation. See Section 2 for the complete dependency mapping.


Appendix D: Canonical Legacy Artifact Table — Professional & Institutional Outputs

The following artifacts represent enduring professional and institutional outputs of the Breakthrough System. Each inherits its Founding Attribution from the project that created it.

Legacy Artifact Description Created By Attribution Form
DPI Engineer (DiPian™) Certification Pipeline The global certification pipeline for DPI Engineers. IMPACT Board Inherits from IMPACT Board Founder
DPI Engineer Global Fellowship Program Flagship program seeding DiPians in Ministries of Education. IMPACT Board Inherits from IMPACT Board Founder
Annual Africa DPI-Ed Summit Flagship annual convening of Ministers, practitioners, and partners. V&P_Core Inherits from V&P_Core Founder
DPI-Ed Case Study & Knowledge Series Peer-reviewed documentation of the Breakthrough experience. V&P_Core Inherits from V&P_Core Founder
DPI Engineer Certification Curriculum Canonical curriculum for the DiPian™ discipline. PREMIER Institute Inherits from PREMIER Institute Founder

Note: These artifacts carry the Founding Attribution of their parent project's Founder automatically. A Development Partner who funds the IMPACT Board's Tranche 1 receives "Founded by" attribution on every artifact the IMPACT Board project creates, including the Certification Pipeline and Fellowship Program.


Appendix E: Product Associations (Tranche 2)

As the RESPECT Ecosystem matures, Product Associations — representing App Developers, Localizers, and other commercial participants — will be formally constituted. These associations are expected to begin as African bodies and expand internationally as the ecosystem grows (particularly following the Accelerate Learning XPRIZE (2026–29)). Naming and hosting rights for Product Associations are reserved for the Tranche 2 funding round and are therefore excluded from this document. Founding Circle members will receive Right of First Refusal on Product Association attribution when these bodies are constituted.


Appendix F: Founding Circle — First Mover Privileges

V&P_Core's First Mover (via the Luqmān Project) will receive:

  1. "Africa's EdTech Breakthrough Project, Founded by [Development Partner]" — the highest-value naming attribution in the system.
  2. Right of first refusal on funding any Planet-Project, enabling the First Mover to deepen their legacy across multiple named artifacts or to allow other Development Partners to claim specific Planet-Projects, broadening the coalition while preserving the First Mover's primacy.
  3. Institutional Hosting prestige — if the First Mover is Gulf-based and exercises its right of first refusal on the relevant Planet-Projects, the GEOS Organization, SOCLE Board, IMPACT Board, and PREMIER Institute will be domiciled in their region, conferring the cumulative prestige of hosting globally significant institutions (subject to the Hosting Cap and Planet-Project Dependency rules).
  4. Right of First Refusal on Product Association attribution — when Product Associations are formally constituted (expected during Tranche 2), the First Mover will have first claim on Founding, naming and hosting rights for these bodies (see Appendix E).

The Second Mover selects from remaining available Planet-Projects and hosting opportunities.


Appendix G: Attribution Format

All legacy naming follows the format:

"The [Artifact Name], Founded by [Development Partner]"

Never: "Founded by [Development Partner]: The [Artifact Name]" or any other ordering.

Examples:

For Scaling Attribution during the scaling phase:

"The [Artifact Name], Founded by [Founder]; Scaled by [Scaler]"